While looking at this
review of the movie Megan is Missing (cf my review
here), I noticed the same sorts of comments that always come up regarding a confrontational horror movie. Here are just a few of these gems:
This movie has no redeeming qualities. This is not a "powerful" film
and there is no message to be delivered- no lesson to be learned. What
we have here is a thinly-veiled attempt to deliver a child porn snuff
film disguised as a third-rate found footage movie. The acting was
terrible. None of it was believable. I would not subject any child to
this obscenity. Parents, if you want to teach your kids the dangers of
the internet, go ahead- you don't need a worthless film to do that.
I must say i am at disgust (?) with these comments. (For example, I don't know what a "Not Rated 17" rating would be. The whole point of NR is that extreme movies often are not rated.) But wait, there's more of this from the users at Netflix:
I would never intentionally watch a snuff film, so
this is probably the closest I'll come. They say it serves a moral
purpose, maybe it does, but I imagine it will serve as a blueprint for
as many perverts as it serves as a socially conscious warning for
teenagers. I'm sorry I watched it, it was a mistake.
Since it is entertainment and a how-to manual for psychopaths, I give it one star.
This is more like a SNUFF FILM. I am sorry i even
watched it. I wouldn't think NetF&$x or any other distributer [sic] would
be able to distribute this kind of film.
Hmm, very interesting! Let's continue on with this line of reasoning: obviously The Godfather is nothing more than a how-to manual for criminals, and clearly the only reason that someone would like Schindler's List is because they want Jews to die.
No, wait! That's ridiculous. These idiots have it completely backwards. In fact, the entire point of watching movies is that we get to experience, in a safe environment, things that we do
not want to experience in real life. Nobody watched Saving Private Ryan and then left the theater wishing that they were storming the beaches at Normandy. Horror is an extreme example of this. Nobody watches slasher movies because they want to kill a bunch of teenagers. Nobody watches haunted house movies because they want to live in a haunted house and get terrorized by ghosts.
By analogy, consider a roller coaster. Roller coasters are fun because you get the thrill of falling 100 feet -- something that would normally maim or kill you -- but you get to do it safely. Certainly, extreme horror movies and books are not for
everyone, just as hardcore roller coasters aren't for everyone. But for those of us that like it, horror is like an ethical roller coaster: we get to vicariously experience life-threatening or taboo-shattering situations in a morally safe environment. Nobody was
actually killed in the making of Megan Is Missing.
In fact, the disturbing nature of extreme horror comes
precisely from the fact that the viewer is not a serial killer or rapist. A filmmaker who sets out to disturb or confront an audience with a movie such as Irreversible, I Spit On Your Grave, Salò, A Serbian Film, Men Behind the Sun, Funny Games, etc., does so with the expectation that the viewer is operating within the conventional bounds of morality. The disjunction between the viewer's moral sense and what is shown onscreen is exactly what makes the film disturbing! If you think that torture is awesome and hilarious then the effect of Men Behind the Sun will be totally lost on you.
Let me give Thomas Ligotti (from whose work the name of this blog is derived) the last word. From his excellent essay "The Consolations of Horror" which opens my
favorite book of all time:
Horror, at least in its artistic presentations, can be a comfort . . . . Hence that arena of artificial experience, supposedly of the worst kind -- the horror story -- where gruesome conspiracies may be trumped up to our soul's satisfaction, where the deck is stacked with shivers, shocks, and dismembered hands for every player; and, most importantly, where one, at a safe distance, can come to grips (after a fashion) with death, pain, and loss in the, quote, real world unquote.
. . . As in any satisfying relationship, the creator of horror and its consumer approach oneness with each other. This, then, is the ultimate, that is only, consolation: simply that someone shares some of your own feelings and has made of these a work of art which you have the insight, sensitivity, and -- like it or not -- peculiar set of experiences to appreciate. Amazing thing to say, the consolation of horror in art is that it actually intensifies our panic, loudens it on the sounding-board of our horror-hollowed hearts, turns terror up full blast, all the while reaching for that perfect and deafening amplitude at which we may dance to the bizarre music of our own misery.